Re: C/C++ are dying too!

The question to ask, is what language are the 'new' languages that are meant to be replacing C written in?

Only once a replacement becomes self-hosting and bootstrapable, does it begin to become a viable alternative to C.

If it ever becomes the language of choice for the authors of new languages, then we might have a contender.

The only language I've seen that I think could replace C, is The D Language.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re: C/C++ are dying too!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: C/C++ are dying too! by jplindstrom (Monsignor) on Apr 25, 2008 at 23:59 UTC
Your reasoning about D stands, but you should also consider that "languages that could replace C" also includes Java and the common dynamic languages, for a lot of programs that shouldn't have been written in C in the first place. /J	[reply]
Re^3: C/C++ are dying too! by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 26, 2008 at 00:13 UTC
Point taken, but I was thinking of "languages that could replace C" in the sense of those that could replace what C can do, rather than what people do with C. For example, be the language of choice used to implement "Java and the common dynamic languages". I've a funny feeling that Java is written in C++, but the point holds. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. "Too many [] have been sedated by an oppressive environment of political correctness and risk aversion."	[reply]
Re^3: C/C++ are dying too! by Anonymous Monk on Apr 26, 2008 at 07:15 UTC
Java can't replace C	[reply]