Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: (OT) Has anyone gone from perl to lisp?

by hawtin (Prior)
on Jul 18, 2008 at 11:47 UTC ( [id://698578]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to (OT) Has anyone gone from perl to lisp?

I did the exact reverse, Common Lisp/ Scheme (in the 1980s) => C/ Java (in the 1990s) => Perl (now). My reasons for using Perl these days are that:

  • Most of the code I write is for prototyping, to prove a point, it does not need to be fast or maintained by others and Perl (for me) is the quickest language to write (not the most efficient or most maintainable).
  • I work on Windows/ Linux and other systems and I need a language that just works everywhere.
  • CPAN: The structure of Perl just makes building reusable modules easy, the reason there is no CPAN for Lisp is because of the way the language works. CPAN is just so far ahead of anything similar it makes it possible to build stuff with Perl that would take forever with any other language.
  • Style: Perl can be written in whatever style makes it easy the address the problem. My scripts are a mix of procedural, functional, object and logic programming. This can make it hard to maintain someone else's code, but that's not usually an issue.

And no, I never left Emacs. I used it on the Symbolics in the 1980s and I use it on my Windows machine today.

  • Comment on Re: (OT) Has anyone gone from perl to lisp?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://698578]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-25 12:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found