Re^2: C-style for loop

by LanX (Saint)

on Nov 15, 2008 at 21:54 UTC ( [id://723851]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

@cnn: your solution is almost the shortest (well,you can abbreviate foreach with for ; ). And I prefere this one!

But the OP wants to conform to the styleguides of PBP & Perl Critics, and postfix-loops are disadviced!

If I was in this situation, I would prefere

_clean_param($_) for @values;
[download]

with the routine transforming $_[0] directly, (it's an alias)

UPDATE: or

_clean_params(@values); # sub takes arr_ref by prototype
[download]

Cheers LanX

Comment on Re^2: C-style for loop Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: C-style for loop by DrHyde (Prior) on Nov 17, 2008 at 10:15 UTC
But the OP wants to conform to the styleguides of PBP & Perl Critics, and postfix-loops are disadviced PBP advises against a lot of useful things. That doesn't mean that you shouldn't use them. It means that you shouldn't use them without a little bit of thought. In the right place, a C-style for loop is Just Fine. In the right place, a "postfix-loop" is Just Fine.	[reply]
Re^4: C-style for loop by LanX (Saint) on Nov 17, 2008 at 15:32 UTC
You missunderstood me, it's the OP who cares about the defaults of Perl::Critics, not me! 8 ) Cheers LanX - - - - - Which song??? UPDATE: Hmm, I think my position was already quite clear, did you read the whole thread or is PBP just your equivalent to Pawlows bell? (SCNR ; )	[reply]

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://723851]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others exploiting the Monastery: (6)

As of 2024-04-20 00:48 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found