good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
Re^3: see XML::LibXML::Readerby mirod (Canon) |
on Dec 08, 2008 at 10:01 UTC ( [id://728884]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I happen to think that load time is important, and the time to fork should impact all tests similarly.BTW XML::Twig does probably very badly in this respect, so you can't say I am biased. As far as I know, no one has ever challenged the "SAX is lightweight and fast" before I published this benchmark. And no one since then has ever come up with any figure that would prove me wrong when I say "SAX is slow". Of course my benchmarks are imperfect. Of course I am sure you could do better. Then do it.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|