Re: Is "=for html" supported in POD rendered by search.cpan.org?


The stupid question is the question not asked
	PerlMonks

by LanX (Sage)

on Dec 18, 2008 at 14:33 UTC ( #731258=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

I can't answer your question, but maybe it's a (relative) linking problem. Did you also try base64 encoding?

Cheers Rolf

Comment on Re: Is "=for html" supported in POD rendered by search.cpan.org?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Is "=for html" supported in POD rendered by search.cpan.org? by jplindstrom (Monsignor) on Dec 18, 2008 at 14:48 UTC
No, the whole html chunk is missing, so given the other answers I've seen here I suspect the POD renderer filters out elements with <img> in them. Or it's the divs I put in there to lay it out, or the relative ../.. url, or the style attribute, or something else. /J	[reply]
Re^3: Is "=for html" supported in POD rendered by search.cpan.org? by LanX (Sage) on Dec 18, 2008 at 14:59 UTC
Hmm ... given the other examples you can at least insert a http-link to the image. Maybe as a fall back solution ... Cheers Rolf	[reply]

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://731258]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others studying the Monastery: (2)

As of 2023-03-25 19:30 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

Notices^?