Re^2: the "our" declaration ?!!

The strict pragma only protects the current namespace as you can see in some oneliner examples below.

# set variable, check items in PKG symbol table
$ perl -Mstrict -e '$PKG::foo=1; print keys %PKG::'
foo

$ perl -Mstrict -e '$foo=1; print keys %main::'
Global symbol "$foo" requires explicit package name at -e line 1.
Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.

$ perl -Mstrict -e 'our $foo=1; print grep {/foo/} keys %main::'
foo
[download]

print+qq(\L@{[ref\&@]}@{['@'x7^'!#2/"!4']});

Comment on Re^2: the "our" declaration ?!! Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: the "our" declaration ?!! by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jan 20, 2009 at 12:35 UTC
I don't understand what you are saying, and your code doesn't contradicts anything I said. >perl -Mstrict -le"{ package PKG; $foo=1; }" Global symbol "$foo" requires explicit package name at -e line 1. Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors. >perl -Mstrict -le"{ package PKG; no strict 'vars'; $foo=1; } print fo +r grep /foo/, keys %main::" >perl -Mstrict -le"{ package PKG; our $foo=1; } print for grep /foo/, +keys %main::" >perl -Mstrict -le"{ package PKG; no strict 'vars'; $foo=1; } print fo +r grep /foo/, keys %PKG::" foo >perl -Mstrict -le"{ package PKG; our $foo=1; } print for grep /foo/, +keys %PKG::" foo [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: the "our" declaration ?!! by rir (Vicar) on Jan 20, 2009 at 21:54 UTC
The strict pragma only protects the current namespace No, remove the `use strict;` and the below will run without complaint. `package X; use strict; sub one { 1 } package Y; $yy = 1; package main; exit; __DATA__ Global symbol "$yy" requires explicit package name at x line 6. Execution of x aborted due to compilation errors.` [download] Be well, rir Update: added initial quote for clarity	[reply] [d/l] [select]


"be consistent"
	PerlMonks