Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Suggestion for a new tag: <update> (updates--)

by tye (Sage)
on Mar 03, 2009 at 06:00 UTC ( [id://747626]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Suggestion for a new tag: <update>
in thread Suggestion for a new tag: <update>

Yeah, that is the best practice for exactly those reasons.

Certainly, there are cases where updates are just fine (essentially, where the update is helpful to people seeing the node for the first time but won't be missed by those who have already read the node).

As for augmenting Newest nodes with Newestly minorly updated nodes and Newestly majorly updated nodes and User settings for what constitutes 'major' vs 'minor', no, as you can probably tell from my ficticious title choices, I don't see that as a great direction to go. (And the "this is a major update" checkbox has been a good example of a site feature that doesn't work very well in practice.)

So I don't see much value in complex features for assigning timestamps to updates, etc. The best way to put a timestamp on a clarification is to put that clarification in a new node.

- tye        

  • Comment on Re^4: Suggestion for a new tag: <update> (updates--)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://747626]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-04-24 07:32 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found