Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Women in Perl - Ada Lovelace Day

by moritz (Cardinal)
on Mar 25, 2009 at 00:02 UTC ( [id://752982]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Women in Perl - Ada Lovelace Day
in thread Women in Perl - Ada Lovelace Day

I think you have a valid point there. But you also have to be very careful; the chances that the purely biological differences explain the extreme gender gap in programming are very slim.

I recommend reading these two articles about the social and environmental aspects (both found from the Debian Women project)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Women in Perl - Ada Lovelace Day
by punch_card_don (Curate) on Mar 25, 2009 at 02:08 UTC
    Well I took time to read the first one. On a strictly academic level, it suffers from a major flaw common to students - her mind was made up before she started writing and went out seeking material to support a preconceived idea. This isn't a research paper, it's an argument.

    From the article: A recent study found that ``women are often still depicted on television as half-clad and half-witted, and needing to be rescued by quick-thinking, fully clothed men'' really? We must be watching very different TV, 'cause what I see is sitcom dads as bumblig buffoons playing to their morally superior wives, commercials in which if there's a twit or a loser it's always the man, where the bank counselor is always a woman, where any mention of technology requires they show a female, and where if there's child playing sports 4 times out of 5 it's a girl playing soccer, or hockey if it's a Canadian commercial. This report was written to present what was desired to be presented.

    Anyway - so let's assume she's right - that environment plays a large role. Neither Locke's tabula rasa nor Rousseau's plants to be cultivated, but somewhere in between, I'd easily accept it plays as large a role as biology. I'm not sure it's any different, though. Where's that environment come from? The natural instincts of the other humans around her. Sure, you can modify it to some degree with conditioning. You can teach a tiger to live on straw. You can turn men into metrosexuals and women into fembots on the outside, but doing so is de-naturing them to suit an ideology, not freeing their true selves.

    Take the last 30 or so years. What we've proven is that if you bathe girls in self-esteem their entire lives, wrap them in advocacy you-go-girl programs, create a legal work environment that nearly criminalizes masculin behaviour around them, and try with all your might to drag them into certain professions, you will still end up with 80% of women employed in what are essentially specializations of of their tradtional roles - caregivers, educators, administrators, traders... At some point you gotta recognize that ideology is not enough - these other things just don't interest most girls and humanity will not be remade to suit the desired numbers.

    Sure, let those who really want to do something different do it. But in recent years it's been way beyond that and verging on gender re-programming to produce the result desired by some ideologues.

      Just an observation, I really found this comment interesting:

      We must be watching very different TV

      Actually, you are. The report was published in 1991. TV was much different almost 18 years ago. Much of what you describe has changed during that time period. For a somewhat geeky example compare the female roles in Star Trek: The Next Generation with Babylon 5, the Stargate series, and Battlestar Galactica. Or for more mainstream viewing, how about Numb3rs, Criminal Minds, or the CSI franchise.

      Television isn't the same as reality, but the roles in which women are portrayed as competent have definitely changed.

      I tend to be aware of this subject because my wife has worked for more than 15 years on Expanding Your Horizons, a conference for introducing middle school girls to female role models in math and the sciences. When she started, many of the girls were completely blown away that women could do any of these jobs. Now, the girls are not surprised by the different professions at all.

      Update: modify show list and minor edits.

      G. Wade
      Take the last 30 or so years. What we've proven is that if you bathe girls in self-esteem their entire lives, wrap them in advocacy you-go-girl programs, create a legal work environment that nearly criminalizes masculin behaviour around them, and try with all your might to drag them into certain professions, you will still end up with 80% of women employed in what are essentially specializations of of their tradtional roles - caregivers, educators, administrators, traders...

      So you say that the "failure" of the programs that want to push girls to tech jobs is a proof that they just don't want to, even though many of them are still permanently confronted with the traditional role models at home?

      On a somewhat related note I find it interesting that you list administrators as a traditional female role; with my limited historical knowledge I think that in the medieval age it wasn't one. So it seems that these roles do change over time. Maybe we're just in the medieval age of computing, and still have a long way to go?

        I got lazy and used "administrators" in a more general sense.

        Throughout most of history men and women have divvied up the tasks along somewhat similar lines. You have to ignore grossly perverting factors like our images of medieval nobility where roles are completely falsified by money and they apply to only a tiny proportion of the population. The correct model to consider of any time is the common man and woman.

        Typically they've split things up like this - he concentrates mainly on things like hunting, heavy farming, war & defence, engineering & building, governing & keeping the public peace. She concentrates mainly on things like child rearing & education, caregiving, managing & administrating the household, local social associative activities, marketing (that is, getting products to and from market), light farming, and the like. Not that the lines were ever clearcut - when the fields needed clearing, she pitched in, and when the kids needed discipline he was an equal parent - so these were more tendencies than strict divisions.

        Along came the industrial revolution and men left the home and the community from sun-up to sun-down to specialize in just one task in exchange for money with which they could pay other men to take care of all the other tasks for them. But they specialized in those typically male tasks, engineering machines, building an industrial complex and producing the goods women needed to make a household. All the white collar management stuff followed more as a necessary means to manage it all as it grew. The technology and wealth this produced was a great boon to mankind, but, frankly, the jury is still out on whether the particular way this re-organized daily life and society in general was a good thing. Men gave up independence and freedom for the shackles of a factory floor or office and a paycheck.

        Fast forward 200 years, and women are hot to follow men into the industrial complex. And where do they go? Health care, teaching, retail, white collar manangement & administration, banking, service industries...they do exactly the same as men, specialize in those tasks they are naturally drawn to to earn money to pay other women to do all the other tasks they no longer have time to do for themselves.

        But this doesn't suit some people's ideology, so we try to re-program kids and re-engineer people's natural behaviours (the 'environment') to produce the desired result. Mao's communists succeeded in training kids to turn in their own parents to produce the model of society desired by the central planning ideologues, which one would think runs counter to all natural human instincts. So it can probably be done, but at what cost.

Re^5: Women in Perl - Ada Lovelace Day
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Jun 01, 2009 at 15:59 UTC
    From the link, "there are still people who believe,..." But there are still people who believe that the earth if only a few thousand years old, or is flat.

    "Additionally, people tend to live up or down to the expectations that are communicated to them. " I don't know if that applies to the Natural Born Geek, who is to begin with a non-conformist.

    "Bias in Toys": I think there might be more pressure against boys playing with girl toys than vice-versa. Most of them are more aptly "non-girl-specific" toys than "boys toys". The kids generally choose the toys they want to play with, and often a selection is available because of siblings or group care environments. For our purposes, isn't the bias instead the "age appropriate" toys? And how many kids, of any age, would be admonished for trying to take the thing apart rather than play in the intended manner?

    Marketing of computer games: I think my niece chooses the games she's interested in based on previous experience with the game and friend's recommendations of what to try, not what's on the cover, which gets quickly lost as the disc's are in an unkempt pile. She'll naturally put in Animal Doctor or Pinada Garden rather than playing Basketball that's already loaded.

    I think the effects of the biases, for the purpose of engineering and computer developers, is overstated. this is particularly true for the top echelon Geeks who would do what they were drawn to, in open defiance of sterotyping. But these are even more different, in terms of numbers of each sex.

    As for remembering prominant women in computer science, in addition to Ada Lovelace I'm aware of Adele Goldberg and Grace Hopper.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://752982]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-03-29 12:21 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found