Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Licensing and Rape-Proofing your ideals.

by deprecated (Priest)
on Apr 25, 2001 at 03:24 UTC ( [id://75315]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Licensing and Rape-Proofing your ideals.
in thread Licensing and Rape-Proofing your ideals.

As much as I hate to contribute to a silly flamewar waged against me, I do have something useful and insightful to contribute to this thread (which will hopefully die today):

If, as you state, MusicCity never intended to fsck the OpenNap community, then open your specification and allow other clients to use the same protocol so we will have our community again. You have succeeded in fragmenting our users and our networks. Now, give back what we gave to you -- the community, and you can continue to profit through your client and our (I include myself and your adminstrators in "our" there) hard work.

That isnt asking too much. If it is, as you say, pure p2p <!- yeah fucking right it is... a simple netstat will show you that their client is connecting to a group of _servers_ not a group of _clients_. these people are liars. ->, then it is a new specification and I think you owe it to the community to allow others to use it. That was the idea that got all of us together. WinMX, AudioGnome, TekNap, my client/modules, and so on. All of us. One specification, many users. Open specifications breed many clients and many clients means many consumers (and ad click-thrus if you like)...

I sincerely hope you will do The Right Thing.

alex j. avriette
brother dep
known as devnull and deprecated in the nap communities

the source shall set you free.

--
Laziness, Impatience, Hubris, and Generosity.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Licensing and Rape-Proofing your ideals.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Licensing and Rape-Proofing your ideals.
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 07, 2001 at 04:54 UTC
    I read with interest your post on bringing together users of all these clients, such as winmx and audiognome, in some sense of unity. I entered a linux chatroom as a linux newbie to ask for help many months ago. The room was on an opennap server that was part of a network called 'opencrap'. I wanted to learn how to configure opennap and teknap on my new o/s. I hardly had a chance to type before being killed from the server for using the audiognome client, by an admin called 'devnull'. This person's parting shot to me was 'audiognome? ewww...you suck!' I just wondered if this devnull, and the devnull you say you are know as, are related in any way? Cyder

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://75315]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others admiring the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-20 05:43 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found