note
Roy Johnson
What <i>are</i> legitimate reasons to put it in List::Util?
<p>
Having List::Utils, List::MoreUtils, List::EvenMoreUtils, List::SomeMoreUtilsByMe, List::AnotherCoupleUtilsTheyForgot, etc. seems like it might be a Bad Thing. Better to have basic list utilities in one List::Utils module, I think. And the reason they're not included? They're "<i>too</i> basic".
<p>
It's a perfectly good reason to include them in List::Util. It's not an absolute mandate that they be included, but it is a reason.
<!-- Node text goes above. Div tags should contain sig only -->
<div class="pmsig"><div class="pmsig-300037">
<hr>
<small><b>Caution:</b> Contents may have been coded under pressure.</small>
</div></div>
760703
760729