Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Down-vote Bad, Up-vote Good (abstain)

by generator (Pilgrim)
on Jun 09, 2009 at 02:10 UTC ( [id://769755]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Down-vote Bad, Up-vote Good (abstain)
in thread Down-vote Bad, Up-vote Good

I also completely agree with Old Grey Bear's statements. It never occurred to me that one's ambivilance toward voting a node would be a metric worthy of reporting.

From my view, doling out ++ votes is an indication that I am in some way positively disposed toward a node. A -- vote, an indication that I disagree enough to express dissatisfaction with the spirit or content of the node.

Often, however, I will review the Recently Active Threads, hoping to find sparkling gems that I just can't wait to reward with my ++ vote. Sometimes there just isn't that much sparkle (or I'm unable to appreciate the sparkle). I'll often double back to the nodes I've already read and deign to grant them my positive vote because, after compared to the alternatives, they are worthy of merit.

Making anything of my having passed over the node initially, wouldn't seem right. It might even create a contradictory signal if I later gave it a ++.

After all "Best in Show" is limited to what's in the show.

Interestingly, OGB's admiration for the long absent Abigail-II has made me wonder if I shouldn't consider expanding my consideration to all posts not just those made "today" or even "recently".

<><

generator

  • Comment on Re^5: Down-vote Bad, Up-vote Good (abstain)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Down-vote Bad, Up-vote Good (defer)
by tye (Sage) on Jun 09, 2009 at 04:22 UTC
    I would consider it a "neutral" vote so it might be worth including in "x number of votes" info.
    Making anything of my having passed over the node initially, wouldn't seem right. It might even create a contradictory signal if I later gave it a ++.

    I guess you didn't really follow the preceeding discussion. Nobody is proposing counting when somebody defers voting, only when one abjures ever voting upon a node (in order to be shown the node's reputation), a feature that has not been implemented.

    - tye        

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://769755]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (7)
As of 2024-04-25 11:08 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found