Re^2: Modern vs postmodern?


We don't bite newbies here... much
	PerlMonks

Re^2: Modern vs postmodern?

by doom (Deacon)

on Aug 07, 2009 at 20:14 UTC ( [id://786912]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Modern vs postmodern?
in thread Modern vs postmodern?

I'm hearing a lot of good things about Mouse as a lighter-weight alternate to Moose.

(Nothing I like better than having ten-thousand WTDI to investigate some time, in my copious spare time... the curse of the perl programmer.)

Comment on Re^2: Modern vs postmodern?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: Modern vs postmodern?
by stvn (Monsignor) on Aug 08, 2009 at 15:38 UTC

I'm hearing a lot of good things about Mouse as a lighter-weight alternate to Moose.

Actually, we have been discouraging the use of Mouse since it is just impossible to make Mouse and Moose smoothly interact with one another. Any::Moose was an attempted solution to this, and it works to a degree, but all too often Mouse code will outgrow what Mouse can provide and the author will end up switching to Moose. This is exactly what happened with CHI actually.

-stvn

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom