in reply to Signals in Strawberry Perl: Name or number?
This was my test code:
I don't have Strawberry Perl, but I tried it on ActiveState Perl 5.10.1 and got the same result, i.e. no output. I tried it on 5.10.0 on Cygwin and 5.8.8 on CentOS(Linux) and it worked correctly, i.e.
The ActiveState documentation says that alarm is not supported and signals are not properly supported anyhow. It's a Windows thing, but neither implementation should just drop-out without so much as a 'sorry'. The code is perfectly legal, if a bit of an edge case.
(The quotes around 'ALRM' required for strict).#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; $SIG{ALRM} = sub { print "Alarming!\n"; }; kill 'ALRM', $$; print "Not alarming\n";
I don't have Strawberry Perl, but I tried it on ActiveState Perl 5.10.1 and got the same result, i.e. no output. I tried it on 5.10.0 on Cygwin and 5.8.8 on CentOS(Linux) and it worked correctly, i.e.
On Windows and ActiveState perl, tracing shows that it does exit on the kill. I tried the same with an INT signal and that did not work either, however the symptoms were different. It did not execute the signal handler but it did not crash either.Alarming! Not alarming
The ActiveState documentation says that alarm is not supported and signals are not properly supported anyhow. It's a Windows thing, but neither implementation should just drop-out without so much as a 'sorry'. The code is perfectly legal, if a bit of an edge case.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Signals in Strawberry Perl: Name or number?
by Marshall (Canon) on Sep 13, 2009 at 18:07 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom