Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask

Re^2: About \d \w and \s

by jakobi (Pilgrim)
on Oct 18, 2009 at 17:35 UTC ( #801894=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: About \d \w and \s
in thread About \d \w and \s

My quick reaction is that the default should be /a...
If there's a way to "use re 'legacy_unicode'"...
But I firmly believe the future default should not be the legacy behavior.

!? (/me wondering about --)

There's enough perl -e one-line filters in shell scripts to make just require an additional 'use' statement a daunting and painful task, merely to retain the originally intended behaviour. So I'd say stick to the ASCII semantics by default, but allow modifiers and use-clauses (file-only scope!?) to modify the behaviour.

With Unicode proper it seems to be useful to add a single new \w escape that includes latin1 umlauts. Similar arguments can be made for extended whitespace escapes.

But basically it's impossible to add enough escapes for all kinds of sensible subsets of digit-class characters, whitespace, word-characters or alphanumerical characters: The only sane way to cope is switching to explicit character classes early in our regex.

And we probably shouldn't even consider wasting an unused character for a new alternative \w-style escape adding latin1-umlauts (says a German, who is using those umlauts all the time).

adding another 0.01 and staying firmly in the ASCII semantics camp,

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://801894]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (6)
As of 2022-06-29 13:25 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My most frequent journeys are powered by:

    Results (96 votes). Check out past polls.