Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Come for the quick hacks, stay for the epiphanies.

Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse?

by Your Mother (Archbishop)
on Feb 22, 2010 at 19:36 UTC ( [id://824690]=perlquestion: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

Your Mother has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

Pod::Coverage::Moose (0.02). Why The Following-

Test file

use strict; use warnings; use Test::Pod::Coverage; use Test::More "no_plan"; pod_coverage_ok( "IsMoose", { coverage_class => "Pod::Coverage::Moose" } );

IsMoose package file

package IsMoose; use Moose; has [qw( moo cow )] => is => "rw", isa => "Str" ; 1; # (Update, added.) =pod =cut

Test output

> prove test-moose-pod.t -v test-moose-pod.t .. ok 1 - Pod coverage on IsMoose 1..1 ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.21 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.24 CPU) Result: PASS

Why isn't that failing? moo and cow are uncovered. This is a boiled down example. I tried several other permutations and my real code with Moose attribute methods and Roles and such are also passing as if it were being tested with plain Test::Pod::Coverage; e.g., only sub named {} are being checked at all.

Do I misunderstand what this does? Am I suffering from PEBCAK?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse?
by Khen1950fx (Canon) on Feb 23, 2010 at 13:21 UTC
    I ran the tests, and they passed. I ran this script to see if it was working or not. I tested it with all the handles. The only one that really didn't work was why_unrated.
    #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; use Pod::Coverage::Moose; my @mods = ( 'Moose', 'Pod::Coverage::Moose', 'Moose::Test', 'MooseX::Types', 'Moose::Micro', 'MooseX::Method' ); foreach my $mod (@mods) { my $pcm = Pod::Coverage::Moose->new( package => $mod ); print 'Coverage: ', $pcm->coverage, "\n"; }

      Thanks but even stripping it down to not running through Test::Pod::Coverage is still not behaving as I'd expect from the docs. This is the plain PCM behavior-

      perl -MPod::Coverage::Moose -le '$pcm = Pod::Coverage::Moose->new(pack +age => "IsMoose"); print $pcm->uncovered' # Prints nothing...

      I expect it to show moo and cow both as uncovered. :( I really like the idea of this module and I'd love to be able to get it to give "real" feedback about Moose attributes/methods.

        I been experimenting with this all day. What has been happening, for me at least, is that I've been adding things that I knew were covered then I'd call $pcm->covered. The module prints out all the methods that are covered and returns 1. On the other hand, when I call $pcm->uncovered on the things I knew to be uncovered, the module returned undef---it didn't print. I was expecting it to return the uncovered handles. The joys of "PEBKAC hell":).
Re: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse?
by webfiend (Vicar) on Aug 06, 2010 at 22:15 UTC

    The default behavior of Pod::Coverage when deciding what to look for (in _get_syms) is to ignore imported subroutines such as those generated for Moose attributes. So even though it sees the methods associated with the attributes, it drops them.

    Maybe Pod::Coverage could use a 'watchlist' argument for its constructor to explicitly specify methods that need pod entries even if they're imported from elsewhere. Then Pod::Coverage::Moose might be able to take advantage of that, sifting through class attributes to build an appropriate watch list based on those defined in the class rather than big meta-stuff like 'blessed' or 'confess'. 'IsMoose::cow'? On the watch list. 'IsMoose::meta'? Not on the watch list.

    The basic problem was reported as a regression a while back.

    I'll have to chew on this thought a little bit.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: perlquestion [id://824690]
Approved by toolic
Front-paged by Corion
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-14 14:45 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found