Re: Subroutine chaining idiom requested

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by Ovid (Cardinal) on May 24, 2001 at 21:42 UTC
FouRPlaY wrote: Is it just me, or is everything on this site turning into a golf challenge? =) 78 letters. My solution: Imagining? Does all here become golf? 37 letters. Though with English, one might argue that I've altered the meaning. Cheers, Ovid Join the Perlmonks Setiathome Group or just click on the the link and check out our stats.	[reply]
Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by tilly (Archbishop) on May 24, 2001 at 21:51 UTC
35 characters. :-) Imagining? Turns all here to golf? And restucturing produces the 29 character logical equivalent of: All here to golf or me only. I don't think that can be improved much. :-)	[reply]
Re: Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by chromatic (Archbishop) on May 25, 2001 at 03:06 UTC
Let's drop 10 characters. PM's now golf only? Update: I'm striving for a complete sentence. Call that -w/strict/English golf.	[reply]
Re: Re: Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by japhy (Canon) on May 25, 2001 at 03:38 UTC
Re (tilly) 5: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by tilly (Archbishop) on May 25, 2001 at 03:45 UTC
(ar0n) Re (2): Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by ar0n (Priest) on May 25, 2001 at 03:35 UTC


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks