Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested

http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=83024

in reply to (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested
in thread Subroutine chaining idiom requested

35 characters. :-)

Imagining? Turns all here to golf?

And restucturing produces the 29 character logical equivalent of:

All here to golf or me only.

I don't think that can be improved much. :-)

Comment on Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by chromatic (Archbishop) on May 25, 2001 at 03:06 UTC
Let's drop 10 characters. PM's now golf only? Update: I'm striving for a complete sentence. Call that -w/strict/English golf.	[reply]
Re: Re: Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by japhy (Canon) on May 25, 2001 at 03:38 UTC
~~All your golf are belon~~ "PM is only golf?" (16) "PM's just golf?" (15) "PM=golf" (7) `japhy` -- Perl and Regex Hacker	[reply]
Re (tilly) 5: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by tilly (Archbishop) on May 25, 2001 at 03:45 UTC
Using the equivalence in your last version, you will get the same return from "PM" (2)	[reply]
(ar0n) Re (2): Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by ar0n (Priest) on May 25, 2001 at 03:35 UTC
Just golf here? [ ar0n ]	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom