Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing

by spx2 (Deacon)
on Mar 07, 2011 at 20:41 UTC ( [id://891908]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing
in thread Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
  • Comment on Re^3: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing
by punkish (Priest) on Mar 07, 2011 at 22:05 UTC
    well, I would benchmark it against LAPACK, but I don't have the time, but if you want, you can do the benchmark and show me that I'm wrong :)
    So, you haven't really benchmarked it against LAPACK. Yet, you imply that PDL is slower than not just one (LAPACK) but many other similar tools. You want to be shown you are wrong. Why don't you make the effort and show that what you are asserting is indeed true.

    Fwiw, I do use Perl/PDL, and I don't use LAPACK, so it doesn't matter how fast LAPACK is.



    when small people start casting long shadows, it is time to go to bed
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://891908]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-04-23 21:49 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found