in reply to Re^4: (almost) foldl
in thread (almost) foldl
missing the point altogether.
No, you did. You mentioned noone's done it your way before, to which I pointed out that noone would do it your way.
Also, the topic clearly states "no extra modules"
Again missing the point.
But you ignored that and answered I question I didn't ask
Most people call that "commenting".
|
---|
In Section
Obfuscated Code