Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: ref to read-only alias ... why? (notabug)

by LanX (Saint)
on Jan 06, 2012 at 17:49 UTC ( [id://946638]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: ref to read-only alias ... why? (notabug)
in thread ref to read-only alias ... why?

Thats what I expected.

> I wonder why.

IMHO legacy code would break if you die here.

But a warning would be great.

Cheers Rolf

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: ref to read-only alias ... why? (notabug)
by dk (Chaplain) on Jan 06, 2012 at 18:08 UTC
    I agree on a warning, it would be a practical thing, after all. And after that, a real fix with 'die' a couple versions later should help the legacy code.

    Well anyway, I found the code suggested by ikegami, so would you guys review the patch please?

    --- pp.c.0 2012-01-06 01:07:34.511988700 +0100 +++ pp.c 2012-01-06 19:04:06.311428300 +0100 @@ -515,9 +515,11 @@ SvTEMP_off(sv); SvREFCNT_inc_void_NN(sv); } - else if (SvPADTMP(sv) && !IS_PADGV(sv)) + else if (SvPADTMP(sv) && !IS_PADGV(sv)) { + Perl_ck_warner(aTHX_ packWARN(WARN_MISC), + "Implicit copy of a read-only scalar due to aliasing"); sv = newSVsv(sv); - else { + } else { SvTEMP_off(sv); SvREFCNT_inc_void_NN(sv); }
        Could you please clarify which the "working case" is in your opinion?

        I agree with tye that there are good arguments for both perspectives.

        Cheers Rolf

        Well, I give up then.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://946638]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others sharing their wisdom with the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-20 06:10 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found