in reply to Re^14: ref to read-only alias ... why? (notabug)
in thread ref to read-only alias ... why?
But my objection is that for(1..3) construct doesn't do aliasing
That's not true. Exactly the same aliasing occurs for both for(1..3) and for(1).
"intentionally returns a modifiable value (in a sense) some of the times" mean
Intentionally coded to return a value that can be changed without causing a read-only error.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^16: ref to read-only alias ... why? (notabug)
by dk (Chaplain) on Jan 08, 2012 at 19:46 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jan 09, 2012 at 09:59 UTC | |
by dk (Chaplain) on Jan 09, 2012 at 16:48 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jan 09, 2012 at 18:15 UTC | |
by dk (Chaplain) on Jan 10, 2012 at 18:33 UTC | |
| |
by LanX (Saint) on Jan 11, 2012 at 02:10 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Jan 08, 2012 at 21:04 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom