Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Come for the quick hacks, stay for the epiphanies.
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
Sorry, no immediate help from me. I use this opportunity for a rant. My excuse is that I have no blog (G+ doesn't count).

I have observed that since Perl modules are overwhelmingly grass-roots and initially almost always single-person efforts, this becomes a good Litmus test for a standard. (A standard is a IETF draft/RFC, W3C recommendation and the like, or Shub-Internet forbid, an ISO spec or worse. You know what I mean.) Can it be reasonably implemented by a single hacker in the spare time before 'e gives up, eyes bleeding from the tech jargon and brain trying to escape through the ears to make the dullness stop? Or do you need to throw money at the problem, assign a swat team of 9-5 professionals to crack the mother open methodically, and eventually? (Hi, Java.)

XML, for instance, falls firmly in the former camp. It's nice and small (really, look just how short the spec is), and as a proof of concept you can even hack your parser with just 200 SLOC bouncing off the regex matcher. (This is where the famous "desperate Perl hacker" meme comes from that was even expressed as a OSCON sticky badge.)

WS-anything, does not, precisely because the standards are huge and unwieldy and messy and IMO barely comprehensibly, trying to solve problems that became rapidly irrelevant (for instance, the whole SAML bullshit can be completely replaced with TLS). With the exception of LWP::Authen::Wsse, I haven't seen adoption in the Perl world. This is the same reason why our SOAP implementations lagged behind, and feature-full implementations only appeared when the heyday of RPC was already over.

tl;dr OASIS is where standards go that are not viable in real life.

Update: telling grantm about XML → facepalm of the day! ~:-| I'm gonna fetch a coffee.


In reply to Re: Anyone doing WS-Trust with Perl? by daxim
in thread Anyone doing WS-Trust with Perl? by grantm

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-17 15:13 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found