Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
Hi,

This has been (partially, sort of) cross-posted at https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/18170.

According to the perl source's uconfig.h:
/* Gconvert: * This preprocessor macro is defined to convert a floating point * number to a string without a . This * emulates the behavior of sprintf("%g"), but is sometimes much mo +re * efficient. If gconvert() is not available, but gcvt() drops the * trailing decimal point, then gcvt() is used. If all else fails, * a macro using sprintf("%g") is used. Arguments for the Gconvert * macro are: value, number of digits, whether trailing zeros shoul +d * be retained, and the output buffer. * The usual values are: * d_Gconvert='gconvert((x),(n),(t),(b))' * d_Gconvert='gcvt((x),(n),(b))' * d_Gconvert='sprintf((b),"%.*g",(n),(x))' * The last two assume trailing zeros should not be kept. */
Unfortunately, on Ubuntu-18.04, the Gconvert macro uses gcvt() - ie the second option.
It's unfortunate because, on Ubuntu-18.04, it produces (for perls whose nvtype is 'double):
$ perl -le 'printf "%.54g\n", 0.3;' 0.29999999999999999
Contrast that with(eg) Windows and freebsd-12.0, both of which correctly output:
0.299999999999999988897769753748434595763683319091796875
The issue is that I want the Gconvert macro on my Ubuntu-18.04 perls (when nvtype is double) to use sprintf() instead of gcvt().
That way, I'll get the correct output, as opposed to the truncated garbage that is currently being displayed.

The question is: "How do I realize that objective ?"
Can I do it via a configure argument when building perl?
Or do I need to do it by hacking the perl source ?

It's a fairly simple hack, if that's what's required.
But I'd prefer to do it via a configure argument, if that's possible.

Cheers,
Rob

PS
I also wonder if people think that this current behaviour on Ubuntu-18.04 should be fixed.
I think it should ... but I shy away from pushing the case because I have this notion that the vast (and I mean VAST) majority of perl practitioners really do not care about it, and would be quite happy for the current behaviour to continue.

In reply to Influencing the Gconvert macro by syphilis

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (2)
As of 2022-05-25 00:18 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you prefer to work remotely?



    Results (84 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?