Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask

comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

You're entitled to your own opinion, but I do disagree. Recently, I tried to install a module in a perl 5.12. This in turn required installation of Module::Build. That in turn required an update of ExtUtils::MakeMaker. And there was no way I could that upgrade installed. ExtUtils::MakeMaker depended on another module that also required to be updated, and that one in turn demanded a more recent version of ExtUtils::MakeMaker. There was no older version of either modules old enough available to upgrade both modules gently. So, I was simply stuck. Like I said, and I'll say it again: if your dependency graph is not a tree, but instead, contains a cycle, these modules in that cycle should not be in separate distributions. Otherwise your repository is plainly broken. p.s. Perl 5.12, to me, is modern enough. I cannot name a single significant difference between perl 5.12 and perl 5.24. Upgrading perl takes hours, because of the need to reinstall every module I ever installed. It's simply not worth it.


What module was it?

I sympathize with you want new thing to work with really old thing seamlessly

but this is not caused by the cycle dependency, which perl has had for the longest time ever

its just all your stuff is really really old, 2010-Apr-12 was a very very long time ago

ExtUtils-MakeMaker alone has had

11 New Features
6 Improvements
18 Enhancements
122 Bug Fixes
33 Test Fixes
31 Doc fixes
8 Win32 fixes...

since 2010-Apr-12 ... and Module::Build had ... and so it goes

the cpan toolkit needs to be kept up to date , esp if the Makefile.PL is making use of new features

What you're really complaining about is third party politics -- you depend on some rpm repository which isn't quite up to taking care of your needs -- it happens

Kinda reminds me of this old thread :) Module::Build users -- please use the "traditional" create_makefile_pl option What's wrong with PREFIX, you ungrateful fucks.

In reply to Re^4: Offline install of perl by Anonymous Monk
in thread Offline install of perl by bdenny

Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (2)
As of 2023-06-05 23:04 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How often do you go to conferences?

    Results (26 votes). Check out past polls.