good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Greetings.
I should perhaps have told that my XML parsing needs do not have a very high byte count - so I am not very concerned about efficiency at this point. So the main reason for using the msxml COM engine is the same as for climbing mount Everest: it's there. I do not need to install anything ,and I get an alternate drop-inimplementation from Xerces COM interface (that I do have to install - check apache.org's site for xerces-c, not the like named java implementation). I could (but have not done it) get the native perl/xerces interface, whose performance should be comparable to xerces. As for perl's XML:: hierarchy, I do not know. I was never able to get a clean windoze install, from CPAN or otherwise though things hav eprobably improved since my last attempt. I heard people that went through it and were much less then awed by the performance level. (And truly, a large DOM tree made entirely of perl objects must be an unwieldy beast..)
Cheers, In reply to Re: Re: Re: XML documentation formatting and transformations
by alien_life_form
|
|