comment on

I'm completely agree with you, because you said nothing that contradicts to my original post.

Also, you did not said anything to answer my question.

Yes, a person is able to design a gazillion numbers of web pages, and refer to them as much as he decides to.

Downvote me hundred of times, and excuse me for being rough, but I can't understand why people bother saying something when this does not adds to what was searched for!

As for my recent examples of same situation I can show Re: How to manage .Xdefaults to be used for Tk on Win32?, and those answers just take away an attention of a person who may be potentially has an answer, and he did not tried to even read it because he saw that there was a number of answers already.

Beleive me, it was a reason why I started such discussion -- I ask a question, then it is covered by unrelated answers, and it becames unanswered because of much noise around and nothing in particular.

Anyway, thank you for your attention,
Chicken

In reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: a bit more about unanswered nodes. by Chicken
in thread a bit more about unanswered nodes. by Chicken

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


"be consistent"
	PerlMonks