comment on

I happen to co-run a slash site. We started running it in the slashcode 1.x days (still using 1.x now, actually). 1.x can be a real pain to configure, otoh, it is a pretty scalable and flexible system. I've heard the Bender codebase (2.x) is a lot easier to use. As far as users submitting top-level posts/articles/stories, is this really a bad thing? You do have complete editorial control over what gets published in the slash system as a top-level content node (i.e. story/article).

I don't know if this is a factor, and I've heard it's changed in 2.x, but slashcode is a pain to virtual host.

--
"I aim for the stars. Sometimes I hit London."
~ W. von Braun

In reply to slash by volkadav
in thread Recommended Content Management System? by Jazz

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


No such thing as a small change
	PerlMonks