comment on

These look like constant subs being redefined. I think that problem was fixed in later versions of Perl. It shouldn't cause a problem.

UPDATE: I just looked at the code and I see the problem. Business::OnlinePayment defines some subs using a routine called "build_subs", but doesn't check to see if they have been defined first. It shouldn't do that. Looks like it expected to run in a CGI environment and not be instantiated twice. This won't cause problems, but it will cause warnings. It would be easy to fix, by making minor changes to the new() sub in Business::OnlinePayment.

In reply to Re: Business::OnlinePayment redefined subroutines, or the little module that doesn't like being used twice by perrin
in thread Business::OnlinePayment redefined subroutines, or the little module that doesn't like being used twice by JPaul

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer
	PerlMonks