Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
Having recently booboo'd by considering a node for deletion that in hindsight should not have been considered (see On Responsible Considerations as to why I feel I should not have - it was OT, which is no reason to consider stuff for deletion), I'd like to rehash the subject of consideration a bit.

As the above mentioned node, and many others touching on consideration, rightly state, consideration can lead to nodes getting reaped, which is a very serious thing. I sure would not like seeing one of my nodes vanishing in a puff of smoke, especially if I'm a new and inexperienced monk still getting my feel for the monastery, and I don't think anybody will disagree with me. Consideration is a serious thing indeed.

Unfortunately, I only read On Responsible Considerations after I had considered a node for deletion, which is of course too late. This leads me to my point: is it technically possible to somehow force a "first time considerer" to read that node before considering any nodes? And what is the monks feeling about the desirability of such a contraption?

Okay, one can make the point that when a monk reaches friarhood, (s)he should have enough of a feel for the procedures and culture of the monastery to act responsibly and look for information on this kind of thing before using it, and that certainly is a valid point. However, it is easy to miss information, be it through laziness or just through the overwhelming amount of info that is available (something to do with a forest and trees). I know that in my case, I did some searching around on consideration and found some nodes on the various shapes and colours of the beast and how to use it responsibly, but as I said, I only came across On Responsible Considerations too late.

Then again, having to read a node and click on some button before doing an action might quickly degenerate into the usual "EULA acceptance" behavior: click without reading. I dunno. Any opinions?

CU
Robartes- keeping his fingers off the consider button for a while


In reply to Another consideration on considering by robartes

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (2)
As of 2022-01-26 08:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    In 2022, my preferred method to securely store passwords is:












    Results (69 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?