comment on

> If the module and its documentation are self-explanatory, and nothing can be added, there's probably no need for a review. :-)

Well ... not really. The fact that someone took the time to review the module and write about it here means that the module is (most probably) worth looking at. Plus it may help people find the module. MIME::Lite is a great example of this. Who would consider looking under MIME if all he wants is to send a mail with attachments?

Jenda

P.S.: It's a shame noone wrote a review of MIME::Lite's rival, Mail::Sender. :-(
I can't do that myself, can I? ;-)

In reply to Re: Re: MIME::Lite by Jenda
in thread MIME::Lite - For outging mail with attachments by trs80

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Just another Perl shrine
	PerlMonks