My recent post
in substance my faith on Perl6 macros as a device to
cast in syntax common programmatic patterns which were not integrated
in Perl6 standard syntax. It makes sense because a programmatic pattern may be common in some context but
not worthwhile to capture in the standard language.
It can also be a way to experiment syntactical devices that
can eventually find their way in Perl6 standard syntax.
I was pointed to
this artima weblog by a (not yet archived) post in ll1. It says that macro
is one of the devices that distinguish LFSPs (Languages For Smart
People) and LFMs (Languages for the masse) and goes to
analyse their implications.
The blog author cites Gilad Bracha who advocates against the introduction
of macros in Java because it is a LFM:
The advantages of Java is that it easily serves as a lingua franca - everyone can read a Java program and understand what is going on. User defined macros destroy that property.
What do you think?
Come to YAPC::Europe 2003 in Paris, 23-25 July 2003.
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
Want more info? How to link or
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.