Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

IIRC, if a monk knows the correct voodoo, it's possible to edit your own rootnodes.

I've got a few suggestions, I'm not saying I've got the answers, nor if it's possible to do any of this within Everything:

  • Remove the ability to edit your own root nodes for normal monks.
    Personally I don't like my own suggestion, since it would only prevent people updating their own nodes when it is really necessary and create more work for the editors.
  • Make it clear to all monks that deleted root nodes will be recovered from backups (and access for that monk to alter them removed?)
    Also not ideal - removing posts is generally a Bad Idea, however people should probably be allowed to retract their own comments. Free Speech (or no Speech).
    Maybe the option of removing the ability to edit your own root nodes should be reserved for only those users that seem to be removing their own nodes.
  • Place a limit on the amount a root node can be altered - i.e. refuse to commit if the user deletes more than 20% of the post
    Probably more trouble than it's worth and could be easily circumvented. Instead of empty root nodes, we'd end up with noise to make up the required characters.
  • Remove edit permissions from a monk for a period of time if any rootnode is edited or truncated.
    This might just stop any large-scale removal of nodes by a disgruntled monk.

As far I see it, there isn't a simple solution to the vanishing rootnode problem.
Something should probably be done, however, as a reasonable number of missing root nodes would impact the Monastery as a whole.

Cheers,

BazB


If the information in this post is inaccurate, or just plain wrong, don't just downvote - please post explaining what's wrong.
That way everyone learns.


In reply to Re: On deleting node contents by BazB
in thread On deleting node contents by gmax

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (3)
As of 2022-01-26 23:54 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    In 2022, my preferred method to securely store passwords is:












    Results (70 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?