comment on

Wouldn't a full history be better because then it would provide the neccesary context? I'm concerned that this could be used in any legal sense anywhere. It would be like me printing out my online bank statment and using that as evidence. Anyone could save the source, edit it, and then load it up and print it. Is our legal system realy so stupid as to accept this as evidence?

Would you mind sharing what role CB conversations played in convicitng you? Or are you refering to conversations in some other medium?

___________
Eric Hodges

In reply to Re: CB history - not an hour any more? by eric256
in thread CB history - not an hour any more? by merlyn

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


There's more than one way to do things
	PerlMonks