The stupid question is the question not asked PerlMonks

### comment on

 Need Help??

Now that I think of it again, I see the flaw in my argument.

I thought that creating the hash and creating the arrays shouldn't matter in the overall time, as it is done much fewer times than the lookups. The flaw (which might be already apparent for you) is that the lookups are not done much more times than building the arrays, only log(n) times moer often if there are n elements.

The calculation yields these times: you do the difficult computation (-s here) n times, plus:

Schwartzian:
Allocating n small arrays, plus n*log(n) array lookups. This means about O(n*log(n)) time, supposing you have a fast malloc.
Strange:
Creating a hash of n elements, plus n*log(n) hash lookups. This means about O(n*log(n)*log(n)) time.

What I'd like to know now is whether my variant of the Schwartzian transform is generally faster than the original one, or does it happen only in this case? It's only a 15% gain here (Update: even fewer with the larger data set), so it might not mean anything.

Yet one more thing. I've just done some more benchmarking. I've added some other variants in creating the hash:

sub sort_new { my %h; @h{@all} = map {-s \$_} @all; @results = sort { \$h{\$a}<=>\$h{\$b} } @all; } sub sort_new2 { my %h = map {\$_, -s \$_} @all; @results = sort { \$h{\$a}<=>\$h{\$b} } @all; } sub sort_new3 { my %h; keys %h = @all; @h{@all} = map {-s \$_} @all; @results = sort { \$h{\$a}<=>\$h{\$b} } @all; } sub sort_new4 { my %h; keys %h = @all; %h = map {\$_, -s \$_} @all; @results = sort { \$h{\$a}<=>\$h{\$b} } @all; }
I am somewhat surprised on the results, I'd have thought that method 2 would be faster than method 1 but no:
/bin/ contains 172 files Benchmark: timing 250 iterations of Ordinary, Schwartzian, Strange, St +range2, Strange3, Strange4... Ordinary: 4 wallclock secs ( 1.14 usr + 2.05 sys = 3.19 CPU) @ 78 +.37/s (n=250) Schwartzian: 2 wallclock secs ( 1.68 usr + 0.18 sys = 1.86 CPU) @ 1 +34.41/s (n=250) Strange: 1 wallclock secs ( 1.18 usr + 0.14 sys = 1.32 CPU) @ 18 +9.39/s (n=250) Strange2: 2 wallclock secs ( 1.32 usr + 0.16 sys = 1.48 CPU) @ 16 +8.92/s (n=250) Strange3: 1 wallclock secs ( 1.14 usr + 0.20 sys = 1.34 CPU) @ 18 +6.57/s (n=250) Strange4: 2 wallclock secs ( 1.53 usr + 0.14 sys = 1.67 CPU) @ 14 +9.70/s (n=250) /usr/bin/ contains 1397 files Benchmark: timing 250 iterations of Ordinary, Schwartzian, Strange, St +range2, Strange3, Strange4... Ordinary: 43 wallclock secs (15.27 usr + 26.38 sys = 41.65 CPU) @ 6 +.00/s (n=250) Schwartzian: 20 wallclock secs (17.37 usr + 2.32 sys = 19.69 CPU) @ 1 +2.70/s (n=250) Strange: 17 wallclock secs (14.22 usr + 1.88 sys = 16.10 CPU) @ 15 +.53/s (n=250) Strange2: 18 wallclock secs (15.75 usr + 1.91 sys = 17.66 CPU) @ 14 +.16/s (n=250) Strange3: 16 wallclock secs (14.01 usr + 2.05 sys = 16.06 CPU) @ 15 +.57/s (n=250) Strange4: 19 wallclock secs (17.04 usr + 2.08 sys = 19.12 CPU) @ 13 +.08/s (n=250) /usr/share/man/man3 contains 3859 files # but 2000+ of these are less +than 100 bytes long Benchmark: timing 250 iterations of Ordinary, Schwartzian, Strange, St +range2, Strange3, Strange4... Ordinary: 150 wallclock secs (49.90 usr + 98.38 sys = 148.28 CPU) @ + 1.69/s (n=250) Schwartzian: 65 wallclock secs (55.72 usr + 8.43 sys = 64.15 CPU) @ +3.90/s (n=250) Strange: 61 wallclock secs (53.28 usr + 7.06 sys = 60.34 CPU) @ 4 +.14/s (n=250) Strange2: 66 wallclock secs (57.68 usr + 7.76 sys = 65.44 CPU) @ 3 +.82/s (n=250) Strange3: 60 wallclock secs (53.29 usr + 7.03 sys = 60.32 CPU) @ 4 +.14/s (n=250) Strange4: 71 wallclock secs (62.48 usr + 7.83 sys = 70.31 CPU) @ 3 +.56/s (n=250)

In reply to Re^3: Benchmark, -s versus schwartzian (vs hash) by ambrus
in thread Benchmark, -s versus schwartzian by Darby

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

• Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
• Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
• Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
• Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.

Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (3)
As of 2022-12-08 02:10 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
Voting Booth?

No recent polls found

Notices?