Keep It Simple, Stupid | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
That's actually a better argument than it might seem like, but, as I wrote in my root node update, if you don't write separate mutators, but rather a single central property setter method, you completely obviate the need for chaining to begin with:
And I was almost going to point out that you were picking up the wrong widget in your rewrite of the chaining because the en passant assignment in
misled me. Really, don't mix these things. It seriously makes reading the code an excercise in frustration. Makeshifts last the longest. In reply to Re^2: Mutator chaining considered harmful
by Aristotle
|
|