comment on

Dear fellows

I was reading the London-PM mailing list today, and stepped over a thread about the newly launched CPANForum. Folks at London-PM don't think this is really a good idea at all, just another source of requests to monitor.

But what called me attention was a post from mr. J. Peterson asking for something (somewhere) to help to discuss CPAN published modules (in the developer|maintainer point-of-view). I gess there is such a place inside the Monastery. Ok, maybe it needs some reformulation, as a RSS feed so authors can be notified about specific posts.

But, except by this, what's wrong with this place? Maybe it should be more specific? Shall we create a "CPAN Module Discussion" section, or somethin'like?

What the Perl Monks think about this?

-- monsieur_champs

In reply to A room for CPAN Modules discussion? by monsieur_champs

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks