![]() |
|
Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
If you throw a MyError::Foo, I would have to explicitly throw that error And if I prefix my error messages with "MyError::Foo" you'd have to explicitly throw an error that started with that string to break my error handling. And if two modules chose bad namespaces--like MyError rather than MyModuleName::Error--then the same problem arises in code that uses both modules. The error vectors are exactly the same! It's still just string compare. The solution is in well chosen namespaces--whether error prefixes or execption class names. Just moving to throwing exception objects rather than strings does not fix the underlying problem: that of badly chosen namespaces! Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re^11: eval to replace die?
by BrowserUk
|
|