comment on

Oh my, that puts the shoe on the other foot does it not? Did you notice the bit I highlighted? Here it is again : XML driven compilers.

But what does that have to do with the language you posted? It wasn't XML driven.

Maybe if you stopped lying, people would actually pay attention to your system.

It's not like it needs to be XML driven. In fact, being XML driven can actually be a negative. You apparently think it's a negative since you didn't stick to XML. So why not promote that fact instead of actively denying it? (e.g. You could say you are using different braces in lieu of different namespaces because it saves typing. Or whatever the reason is.)

*You* are making the conversation about everything but your engine. If you want want it to be about your engine, make it about your engine.

In reply to Re: I will be vindicated by ikegami
in thread I will be vindicated by simonodell

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Perl: the Markov chain saw
	PerlMonks