“Inconvenient,” perhaps, but not “useless.”
In all seriousness, what is so utterly wrong with just using a subdirectory? Apple’s OS/X system is rather elegant, I think, in taking that approach with how they package all applications: they’re actually folders. Just put your executable together more-or-less as a stub, and put the necessary Perl source modules into a directory in a chosen location.
(When I have done this, I used a nested directory structure: the outer directory contained README.TXT and an inner folder named guts. The entire thing was marked read-only. And the README file contained a message which basically said: “Keep your mitts off that folder and everything that it contains. These aren’t the ’droids you’re looking for.” I got a few whimsical comments about that, so I know that some people read it.) To me, this is every bit as convenient a form of “packaging” as a DLL-file would be, and considerably more maintainable. It might well be more efficient, too, because Windows will routinely use VM-mapped file I/O when working with files.
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
Want more info? How to link or
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.