Re: (tye)Re: New code wrap options

If someone wants a class designation for this, then come up with a nice, short, clear name for the class.

class="fragment"

However getting short and clear at the same times seems to me to be setting the bar too high. Maybe having one without the other is preferable?

---
demerphq

_{First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

-- Gandhi}

Comment on Re: (tye)Re: New code wrap options Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: New code wrap options (in-line code CSS class) by tye (Sage) on Mar 12, 2004 at 19:06 UTC
Well, I'd just do "inlinecode". - tye	[reply]
Re: Re^3: New code wrap options (in-line code CSS class) by demerphq (Chancellor) on Mar 12, 2004 at 19:17 UTC
Yep, that was my original though as well, but it seemed too long considering your requirements. I actually thought of suggesting 'icode' but thought that wasnt sufficiently clear. 'inline' or 'inlinecode' seems good to me, as does 'fragment' still. --- demerphq _{First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi}	[reply] [d/l]