http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=42983


in reply to Development of the Perl Monks Code of Conduct

Just some rough thoughts: I realize that not everyone would agree with the above sentiments, but I thought they could be a nice first shot.

Notice that I didn't include anything about discriminatory speech based on gender, race, religion, ethinicity, yada, yada, yada. While I like the thought of including that, how do we word it? I don't think censorship is necessarily an issue as vroom can do with the site as he sees fit, but some of the poetry out there clearly passes the line. When is it art and when is it discrimination?

Frankly, from what I've seen in the monastery, I don't feel that this is much of a problem, but the issue should at least be discussed.

Cheers,
Ovid

Update: I forgot one very important point: What do we do if we have a repeat offender? Ban them? Well, we can't. Dock their XP? Some might not care. Ban their nick? Some might be attached to their nick, some might not. Ignore it?

Join the Perlmonks Setiathome Group or just click on the the link and check out our stats.

  • Comment on (Ovid) Re: Development of the Perl Monks Code of Conduct

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: (Ovid) Re: Development of the Perl Monks Code of Conduct
by Fastolfe (Vicar) on Nov 22, 2000 at 22:07 UTC
    I would say "no logging", but how would we enforce it?

    It's not practical to enforce it, so I say why bother? You can't control what people do with publicly available data on their PC, but you do have some say/rights in how they share that data with others. I think that's what we should focus on. Providing statistics from logged data is (in my opinion) perfectly OK.

    No profanity directed at anyone

    I think this could be summed up by saying "Be mature, no personal attacks against other people". Profanity directed at somebody is just an extension of name-calling. Severity of infraction is dependent upon severity of the attack. Profanity starts to move towards one extreme of that spectrum.

    Don't use published code without citing it. -- Again, tough to enforce.

    "Do not post copyrighted material without appropriate citation and/or permission from the author". You're right; this is largely an honor system thing, and you're also right in that many of us can spot Cookbook material pretty easily. It should be easy for us to then inform vroom or get the author to modify the node to include appropriate attribution. Aside from that, typical copyright stuff applies.

    Aside from that, I agree complete with everything (well, almost everything ;) else!

    David