Re^2: Why Reaped???

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Comment on Re^2: Why Reaped???

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Why Reaped??? by blazar (Canon) on Feb 19, 2007 at 16:55 UTC
No they are from accredited Oklahoma religious schools <Reveal this spoiler or all spoilers in this node or all in this thread> Oh, this changes everything: apologies then! <Reveal this spoiler> Update: Ok, due to negative reactions as evidenced by massive downvoting, I repent and `<strike>` over the above, not because I think that my comment is not legitimate -actually I think it is, and I wholeheartedly agree with CountZero's one, which also was downvoted-, but because if the OP is really a troll as facts now strongly suggest, then fighting trolling by means of further troll-feeding is not going to be a particularly smart strategy. BTW: the same fate will affect my other node of the same nature.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Why Reaped??? by zentara (Archbishop) on Feb 19, 2007 at 14:51 UTC
You've revealed yourself, troll :-) I'm not really a human, but I play one on earth. Cogito ergo sum a bum	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^3: Why Reaped??? by CountZero (Bishop) on Feb 19, 2007 at 17:10 UTC
I'm quite sure that snippet of information will buy you a lot of goodwill in our Monastery. CountyZero "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law	[reply]