http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=663760


in reply to Re^6: creating a variable in an if statement ("don't"s)
in thread creating a variable in an if statement

I think you are both having an odd argument.

I'm not entirely sure whether either of you are currently posting further replies to one another at the time of writing this, but I am sure that you haven't replied to my post.

Hang on though, by the time someone else reads this there might be a reply. Dang.

OK. I've got it. I'm writing this post. That means you can't reply to it yet. But there may be replies to come.

Maybe you're having an ZXY argument?

FAKE EDIT - this post has not been edited.

AHA! I have it. I am not going to post this, then you can't reply it!

PS: I agree with this reply.

-=( Graq )=-

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(OT) Re^8: creating a variable in an if statement ("don't"s)
by Argel (Prior) on Jan 23, 2008 at 20:56 UTC

    I think you are both having an odd argument.

    Actually, I think this is a clear use of steganography. The obvious implication is that ikegami must be part of the Illuminati faction infiltrating PerlMonks. Given how frequently he posts he may be in charge of intelligence and transmitting orders to the rest of the conspiracy members. And the use of silent edits may be an attempt to obfuscate the use of steganography! It's really quite brilliant! :-)

    (And for the record I am of course being facetious.)