in reply to Re: Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam!
in thread Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam!
An alternative would be to only show unapproved nodes to logged-in users.
But aren't they a "legitimate" target market for the spammers?
The other thought that crossed my mind was a "spam" button in the Approval nodelet for anonymous posts.
Once clicked, the only place that post shows up is in the 'nodes to consider' list; where it can be restored with 'Keep' if the spam button has been abused.
The idea being to make the marking of spam a considerably simpler & quicker process than the current 4 present & cooperating monks + a downvote (== extended time when not many monks around).
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam!
by kcott (Archbishop) on Aug 07, 2013 at 10:36 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 07, 2013 at 10:47 UTC | |
by Happy-the-monk (Canon) on Aug 07, 2013 at 11:36 UTC | |
by davies (Prior) on Aug 07, 2013 at 11:57 UTC | |
by kcott (Archbishop) on Aug 08, 2013 at 04:42 UTC | |
Re^3: Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam!
by SuicideJunkie (Vicar) on Aug 07, 2013 at 14:28 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 07, 2013 at 14:36 UTC | |
Re^3: Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam!
by Tux (Canon) on Aug 07, 2013 at 09:30 UTC | |
by sparkyichi (Deacon) on Aug 07, 2013 at 14:48 UTC | |
by Tux (Canon) on Aug 07, 2013 at 15:13 UTC | |
by sparkyichi (Deacon) on Aug 07, 2013 at 15:16 UTC |
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion