http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=181478


in reply to why a nodelet can be kept agains author wish?

Reading the arguments on both sides, the main argument for [The authors right...] is that we are human, make mistakes and have the right to change our minds. This would seemed to be supported by someone (see:Rule 2) held in high regard around here.

The main argument against (ignoring the rather confuted "Stalinist revision of history"), would seem to be that it serves as a deterrent to those that might "post in haste" and as punishment for those that do.

Foregoing any discussions that covers old ground of PM not being a democracy, given that it is a community, and that most

, this form of public humiliation would seem to contravene a certain, well regarded constitution as well as the odd convention or two.

Precedent for citation of Law in Monks 'internal affairs'