Re^7: A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. (Acolyte Level=3 needed)

Up to you. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Personally I'd simplify the system. Less code easier rules, central config.

One unified crap_threshold , one crap_min_user_level and the same clause everywhere and the same message °.

Minimal boilerplate, hence no htmlcode needed.

The idea is once users are passed crap_min_user_level they are mature enough to handle "crappy" nodes.

I suppose handle_threaded_nodes has to be patched too, to ensure that logged in users only see RAT entries of nodes they can access.

°) You might link the message to a doclet with an explanation mirroring the current settings.

But that's an extra, and I'm not sure it's worth it.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

Comment on Re^7: A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. (Acolyte Level=3 needed) Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. (Acolyte Level=3 needed) by jdporter (Paladin) on Apr 23, 2026 at 20:09 UTC
not sure it's worth it. Good point. My feeling is that very little is worth it anymore.	[reply]
Re^9: A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. (Acolyte Level=3 needed) by LanX (Saint) on Apr 23, 2026 at 20:59 UTC
That's not what I meant to say, but fine with me :) We can delay this project till it's "worth it" again. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]