It seems like if you know that it will produce unpredictable results around 20% of the time, you could determine the number of tests necessary to verify that boundary.
I guess I would suggest trying to encapsulate the fuzzy bit into a function that can be swapped out with a less fuzzy (more predictable) function during testing. Then, test the core fuzzy bit separately using sample sizes that are statistically significant.
<tiny>Geeze, I sound like one of my old professers.</tiny>
In reply to Re: Non-deterministic Testing
by osunderdog
in thread Non-deterministic Testing
by moot
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |