Thanks, those both make sense...especially the second one. I don't use the /x modifier much (though as I'm learning, it really helps me remember why I constructed regex's a particular way after I've been away from it for a while) so that one I completely missed.

I'm curious about the first case, though. Given what I've been led to believe are the penalities of using classes, why wouldn't one check the variable to see if it has just one entry and cast it differently...i.e., in a more regex-engine-efficient form?

Just curious.

ack Albuquerque, NM

In reply to Re^2: Why would one want in a regex a class with only a single entry? by ack
in thread Why would one want in a regex a class with only a single entry? by ack

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.