P:\test>517393-3 -N=1 got ...I've <> a question that's <> me... P:\test>517393-3 -N=3 got ...me, and I've <> a question that's <> me stumped. Here's... P:\test>517393-3 -N=5 got ...spot for me, and I've <> a question that's <> me stumped. Here's the problem... P:\test>517393-3 -N=3 and ...spot for me, <> I've got a... ...capture the word <> X number of words before <> after it while... ...than one term <> they overlap, the... P:\test>517393-3 -N=3 the ...me stumped. Here's <> problem I'm trying... ...do is capture <> word and X... ...it while tagging <> matching word in <> captured text. My... ...and they overlap, <> nth term will... ...a regex even <> best way to... P:\test>517393-3 -N=3 of ...somwhat large articles <> text (returned from... ...and X number <> words before and... P:\test>517393-3 -N=10 of ...problem I'm trying to solve. I have somwhat large articles <> text (returned from a search), what I'd like to do... ...like to do is capture the word and X number <> words before and after it while tagging the matching word... #### #! perl -slw use strict; our $N ||= 3; my $word = $ARGV[0] or die "No search term"; my $text = do{ local $/; }; my $re_word = qr[ (?<=\s) $word [[:punct:]]* (?=\s) ]x; $text =~ s[ ( (?: \S+ \s+ ){0,$N} $re_word (?: .{0,60} $re_word )? (?= ( (?: \s+ \S+ ){0,$N} ) ) ) ][ my $extract = "...$1$2..."; $extract =~ s[ ( \s ) ( $word ) ( [[:punct:]]*\s ) ][$1<<$2>>$3]gx; print $extract, $/; ]gsex; __END__ Regular expressions have always been a weak spot for me, and I've got a question that's got me stumped. Here's the problem I'm trying to solve. I have somwhat large articles of text (returned from a search), what I'd like to do is capture the word and X number of words before and after it while tagging the matching word in the captured text. My inital thought was to try something like this. The problem I have is that if there is more than one term and they overlap, the nth term will not be annotated. So my next thought is lookahead/lookbehind, but they don't capture. Is there a way to do this with a single regex? Is a regex even the best way to do this? Thanks, -Lee