Unable to connect
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
|
by choroba
on Mar 21, 2025 at 16:02
|
|
|
Several times today (11:24, 18:11, 20:43 Europe/Prague) I got "Unable to connect" from firefox when trying to connect to RAT. After several minutes, the page was back up. Is it a new problem, or one of the old problems reappearing?
map{substr$_->[0],$_->[1]||0,1}[\*||{},3],[[]],[ref qr-1,-,-1],[{}],[sub{}^*ARGV,3]
|
Login to the site doesn't stick
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
|
by talexb
on Mar 19, 2025 at 16:26
|
|
|
I noticed this new behaviour today -- I logged in, posted a Meditation, then used the same tab to go somewhere else. Half an hour later, I decided to come back to the site .. and I had to log in again.
So, just now, I visited the site, logged in, then opened a new tab (in the same browser window), and once again I was prompted to log in again. That's odd -- has anyone else noticed this behaviour? I'm using Firefox 136.0 (64-bit) on Ubuntu.
Alex / talexb / Toronto
For a long time, I had a link in my .sig going to Groklaw. I heard that as of December 2024, this link is dead. Still, thanks to PJ for all your work, we owe you so much. RIP Groklaw -- 2003 to 2013.
|
Site URLs vary despite same semantics
1 direct reply — Read more / Contribute
|
by etj
on Feb 22, 2025 at 08:30
|
|
|
This is because the CGI variables are emitted in a random order - I expect there's a `keys` call.
I believe it would be better to sort those, so that semantically identical URLs with CGI args will always have the same canonical "spelling", so one can most easily see at a glance whether one has previously visited them.
|
The title page is empty
1 direct reply — Read more / Contribute
|
by choroba
on Feb 20, 2025 at 07:52
|
|
|
When I try to open perlmonks with a domain where I'm not logged in, I see just a blank page.
The browser shows the empty page loaded OK (200).
map{substr$_->[0],$_->[1]||0,1}[\*||{},3],[[]],[ref qr-1,-,-1],[{}],[sub{}^*ARGV,3]
|
perlmonks.org still/again slow
4 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
|
by GrandFather
on Jan 27, 2025 at 18:54
|
|
|
Over the past few days I see 20 - 40 second page load times for any page I've tried to access through https://perlmonks.org. For a typical page fetch (Perl Monks Discussion in this case) Firefox's Developer Tools reports:
Request Timing /?node=Perl Monks Discussion
Blocked: 8.22 s
DNS Resolution: 0 ms
Connecting: 203 ms
TLS Setup: 8.10 s
Sending: 0 ms
Waiting: 13.93 s
Receiving: 405 ms
Request Timing /?node=list replies toggle javascript
Blocked: 6.77 s
DNS Resolution: 3 ms
Connecting: 204 ms
TLS Setup: 6.56 s
Sending: 0 ms
Waiting: 394 ms
Receiving: 0 ms
Finish: 36.20s (The two fetches above are somewhat overlapped. Other f
+etches are ignored.)
Optimising for fewest key strokes only makes sense transmitting to Pluto or beyond
|
Modern PerlMonks in Best Nodes
3 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
|
by Anonymous Monk
on Jan 19, 2025 at 04:47
|
|
|
|
|
SOPW is not accepting any new posts
1 direct reply — Read more / Contribute
|
by syphilis
on Jan 18, 2025 at 01:04
|
|
|
|
|
Bots, missing nodes and outages
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
|
by LanX
on Jan 09, 2025 at 15:21
|
|
|
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I take it that many outages here are caused by misbehaving bots effectively causing a denial of service attack. Especially those bots ignoring no-follow settings.
Now often nodes here are linked not by ID but by name [name]
If the exact name is missing as node title, they cause a supersearch for all node titles containing the words (in any order).
These searches are very slow and I suppose expensive, since the results aren't cached.
Nodelets, which are constantly shown, contain many such links, especially behind ? marks, which until recently were missing real targets.
Now the question:
Could it be that such named-links turning into searches contribute to outages in the monastery?
|
Easteregg: Activate links to Nodelet documentation (update: patch)
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
|
by LanX
on Jan 06, 2025 at 11:13
|
|
|
Hi
(Beats me why this feature is display:none by default...)
Put this
a.nodelethead-annot { display:inline; float:left; font-size:smaller; padding-left:0.2em}
or this
a.nodelethead-annot { display:inline; float:right; font-size:smaller }
into your On-Site CSS Markup in Display Settings
and be surprised to see a little ? appearing in the nodelet titles, conveniently linking to the corresponding documentation.
DISCLAIMER: I'm no web-designer, if you have better CSS-suggestions, shoot away. :)
update
I found the Common CSS settings and filed a patch to activate this by globally by default.
|
PerlMonks .com .net .org Why so many?
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
|
by harangzsolt33
on Jan 04, 2025 at 23:01
|
|
|
I just realized that there 3 different PerlMonks URLS. I am logged in at PerlMonks.com and I was surprised when I clicked on a link that took me to Perlmonks.net/somewhere that I wasn't logged in. So, my question is is there some benefit to having three different sites other than just reserving the name to make sure no one else occupies another one of the main addresses? And why aren't all of the different URLS automatically forward you to PerlMonks.com?
|
Feature Request: Abandon content to Anonymous Monk
3 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
|
by SankoR
on Jan 02, 2025 at 17:44
|
|
|
Originally posted as a reply to New Feature: Claim anonymously posted nodes
Any plans to allow us to do the opposite and abandon content to AM?I've never posted anything too personal or embarrassing but PM is the only site I use where I have absolutely no control or ownership of the content I generate. As long as everything written in this node is true, I'd really love a way to wash my hands of it all. Having my identity attached adds no real value to PM.
|
New Feature: Claim anonymously posted nodes
6 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
|
by jdporter
on Jan 02, 2025 at 12:08
|
|
|
If you are logged in, you may now attempt to claim ownership of a node (root post or comment) currently owned by Anonymous Monk.
If you are directly viewing the node of interest, there will be a little link above the post saying "Claim this anonymous post" "Is this your post?".
Clicking this link just sends takes you to a form where you can send
a canned message to the gods; it does not immediately give you ownership of the node.
When the gods get your request, they will review it and either grant or decline it.
Either way, they will (probably) send you a message to that effect.
This feature is intended to mitigate the following common scenarios:
- You intended to post as your logged-in user but somehow inadvertently were logged out when you posted.
- You are a new user to the site and you created a user account after posting your first one or more posts, and would now like to own those posts.
- You intentionally posted anonymously for some reason and now have changed your mind.
Feedback welcome!
Update:
Based on feedback, I have moved the link a bit. It's now in the same place as the 'Edit' link which appears on nodes you can edit.
Note that putting it into a nodelet would be tricky, and surely more effort than it would be worth, at least at this time.
Update2:
Based on feedback, I have reimplemented the link to take you to Message Outbox, with the recipient and message pre-loaded appropriately.
You can then click "Deliver" to complete the request.
|
News or announcements widget
5 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
|
by harangzsolt33
on Jan 02, 2025 at 00:25
|
|
|
Does PerlMonks offer a little widget people can put on their own website that shows latest Perl news or announcements (or most recent questions posted here) and maybe has a small box where people can type in their email to sign up to get the Perl newsletter in one easy step? I've seen this in other websites that are divided into smaller boxes. One small box contains an ad. Another small box contains a table of contents. Another box might hold some links to related sites. Another small box might hold a tiny weather forecast or stock quote and so forth. Does PerlMonks offer any such thing that people can put on their site?
|
Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks (UPDATE: FIXED)
3 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
|
by LanX
on Dec 21, 2024 at 11:37
|
|
|
I'm not sure if the local emailing is broken, amputated by anti-spam measures by google or if the monastery is simply blocking my IP.
- I tried various email addresses (also non-gmail) to create a new account but no avail
--> Create A New User
- I also tried to get password reminder, also no success
--> What's my password?
Does it work for anyone else?
update
In the meantime I got one new account email via @cpan.org.
Update
Status 2024-12-29: FIXED see Re^4: Email delivery problems (FIXED: DNS propagation completed)
|
vote link to the right of messages
3 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
|
by Danny
on Dec 20, 2024 at 04:41
|
|
|
It might be nice to have a [vote] link to the right of each message where [reply], [/msg], etc are; there is plenty of space for it. That way you never have to scroll to the bottom to vote.
|